← Indietro
Altro

Pressure vessel

Altro di Machine Design 2 per il corso di Mechanical Engineering presso Politecnico di Milano. Materiale proveniente dall’archivio storico Studwiz e classificato per la consultazione online.

Machine Design 2Altro

Informazioni sul documento

Cosa trovi in questo materiale

Altro di Machine Design 2 per il corso di Mechanical Engineering presso Politecnico di Milano. Materiale proveniente dall’archivio storico Studwiz e classificato per la consultazione online.

Qualità dell’importazione: il testo è stato estratto direttamente dal documento originale.

Contenuti estratti dal documento

Passaggi rappresentativi riconosciuti nelle diverse parti del materiale. Il testo completo resta presente nella pagina per la ricerca, mentre l’anteprima compatta rende più semplice la lettura.

Pagina 1

Gussoni Enrico 804089 Olivari Laura 876599 PRESSURE VESSEL OBJECTIVES 1. Perform a static strength (LEFM) of the vessel. Use a pressure equal to P=2Pw 2. Adopting the classic elastic approach (crack presence is neglected), calculate the fatigue life applying a pulsing pressure from zero. The standard requires to use a maximum pressure equals to P=1.5Pw and it also require s a minimum lifespan of N=12000 cycles. For the assessment, use the Sines criterion. 3. Adopting the Paris law, determine the number of cycles so tat the crack depth reaches 95% of the shell thickness. Moreover, evaluate if the vessel fails due to the leak before break or by unstable crack propagation (burst). Use a pressure P = 1.5Pw. 4. Static assessment (LEFM) considering a completely through-thickness crack. Use a pressure P=2Pw. Note we don’t have to provide further safety factor, they are already taken into account POINT 1 - Static assessment (LEFM) GEOMETRICAL DATA, LOAD AND MATERIAL PROPERTIES D=230 mm t=5.8 mm Pw=200 bar UTS=1000 MPa KIC=200 MPaѴm m=3; C=2.5e-13 with R=0 a0 = 0.05*t and c0 = 5* a0 We have first to evaluate the stress intensity factor (SIF). To do it we can consider the shell as a specimen having a rectangular section and a constant remote stress (no stress change are considered in thickness). The analytical solution to estimate K has been computed by Newman and Raju. We get the value evaluating geometry and load data. The Newman and Raju approach considers the presence of both axial and bending loads . In our case the bending is not present and we can evaluate the axial stress due to hoop stress using Mariotte. KA= 24.8028 MPaѴm KC= 12.2110 MPaѴm Static assessment: K <= KIC The static assessment is verified, thus we don’t have brittle fracture. POINT 2 – Fatigue assessment…

Anteprima

Prima pagina del documento.

Prima pagina: Pressure vessel