Document information
- University
- Politecnico di Milano
- Degree programme
- Mathematical Engineering
- Subject
- BAYESIAN STATISTICS
- Academic year
- 2021-2022
- Classification
- Exam · Full exam
- Content
- Exam paper only
- Original format
- Text
- Searchable text
Full exam for BAYESIAN STATISTICS in the Mathematical Engineering degree programme at Politecnico di Milano. The document covers: BAYESIAN STATISTICS A. Guglielmi & M. Beraha 18.07.2022 Properly justify all your answers . Use the indicator function to denote the support of a distr.. Exercise 1 Assume the following conditional density (w.r.t. the Lebesgue measure on R) for the data: X1, . . . , Xn|θ i.i.d.∼
Full exam for BAYESIAN STATISTICS in the Mathematical Engineering degree programme at Politecnico di Milano. The document covers: BAYESIAN STATISTICS A. Guglielmi & M. Beraha 18.07.2022 Properly justify all your answers . Use the indicator function to denote the support of a distr.. Exercise 1 Assume the following conditional density (w.r.t. the Lebesgue measure on R) for the data: X1, . . . , Xn|θ i.i.d.∼
Import quality: text was extracted directly from the original document.
Representative passages recognised in different parts of the material. The full extracted text remains available to search, while this compact preview makes the page easier to read.
BAYESIAN STATISTICS A. Guglielmi & M. Beraha 18.07.2022 Properly justify all your answers . Use the indicator function to denote the support of a distr.. Exercise 1 Assume the following conditional density (w.r.t. the Lebesgue measure on R) for the data: X1, . . . , Xn|θ i.i.d.∼ fθ(x) = 3x2 θ3 1[0, θ](x), θ > 0. 1. Write down the likelihood L(θ; x1, . . . , xn), properly verifying that the indicator function in its expression is equal to 1[maxi xi, +∞)(θ). 2. Show that a conjugate prior density w.r.t. the Lebesgue measure on (0 , +∞) for this model is such that π(θ; α, β) ∝ 1 θα+1 1[β, +∞)(θ), where α, β > 0. Moreover, first derive the normalizing constant for π(θ; α, β). Then, denoting by αn, βn the posterior hyperparameters, find the analytic expression of the posterior density π(θ; αn, βn), deriving explicitly its normalizing constant. (Hint: remember that 1[a, +∞)(θ) × 1[b, +∞)(θ) = 1[c, +∞)(θ), where c = . . . (function of a and b)) 3. Find the posterior mean E π (θ|x1, . . . , xn) of θ, when the prior is the density π found at point 2. Compare it to the maximum likelihood estimate and make a comment. 4. By closely looking at the expression of the posterior mean of θ found at point 3., fix the prior hyperparameters (α, β) in π(θ; α, β) using an old dataset of size 7 and range equal to [2 .3, 15]. 5. Derive the hyperparameters of the posterior (using prior hyperparameters at point 4.), when the current available dataset contains 10 observations and its range is [1 .43, 5] (i.e. 1 .43 = min i xi and 5 = . . .). Moreover, compute the 95% HPD credible interval of θ. 6. By using the posterior odds, test the hypotheses H0 : θ ≤ θ0 vs H1 : θ > θ 0, for any θ0 in R+, using the posterior derived so far. Write down your conclusion when θ0 = 16. Solution of Exercize 1 . 1.…
First page of the document.